Normally, I don’t read reviews of a concert before drafting my own. This time is different. The Düsseldorf Symphony are currently on tour in Spain and last night they played in ADDA, Alicante, having previously played the same program in Madrid, Barcelona and Valencia. The single work in each of the tour concerts is the Symphony No. 3 of Gustav Mahler. Frankly, I came home so moved by the experience that I broke with my tradition and searched for reviews of the previous concerts on the Internet.
It seems from the reviews that Adam Fischer’s interpretation of Mahler is not universally appreciated. The criticism seems to seem to concentrate on his handling of the first movement of this symphony. There was a reference in one review to problems with the orchestral tuning. I find that hard to believe. It seems that to be a reviewer of classical music – whatever that might be! – it is necessary to talk primarily about another version of the same piece, rather than describe the specific performance.
As an audience member last night, it was obvious from the start that Adam Fischer has his own approach to this symphony. In the hands of less inspired conductors, the first movement becomes a rather conventional allegro when the marches appear. The slower material thus tends to take on the nature of an introduction to the eventual allegro. Mahler’s own title for the movement is Pan Awakes: Summer Marches In, signifying the Pan of mythology has something to do with the scenario. I am saying nothing unconventional if U state that this particular Pan is associated with the wild, shepherds and flocks, rustic music, and impromptus. This is the key, I think, to Mahler’s title and, indeed, Adam Fisher’s reading of the first movement.
In the slower sections of the first movement, Mahler effectively wrote chamber music, full of contrasting textures, sonorities and orchestral effects, often in surprising and striking combinations. Adam Fisher, by varying the rhythm here and there, and by inserting often quite long pauses, emphasizes the rusticity and the impromptu nature of music. And by this means the audience can hear essential elements, all the detail and really appreciate the texture. These elements combine together to evoke the feeling of an early morning or evening stroll across Alpine Meadows, where birds sing in the distance, where animals somewhere wander across the field of vision, but remaining distant, even out of sight. The emotions that such sounds evoke are close at hand, but nothing else is, apart from, of course, the emotional reactions they create. Then, when the marches takeover, outlines become clearer, more tangible.
Personally, I find Adam Fisher’s treatment of the first movement, utterly convincing. I heard sonorities I had not heard before. I became conscious of transitions that other conductors had clearly airbrushed out of their interpretations, and I was able to marvel at the unusual juxtaposition of instruments that we don’t expect to play together.
Mahler’s subtitles for the other five movements are derivations of this monumental first movement’s title. He is successively alluded to the world of flowers, animals, man, angels, and love. And throughout, Adam Fischer’s attention to the detail of the score seemed to emphasize these meanings. The minuet second movement was suitably delicate, the third scherzo-like in its abruptness and energy. In the fourth, mankind is revealed contemplative and reflective, whilst in the fifth the angels sing out in perfect harmony.
In the finale, we find Adam Fischer at his best. The long theme was played with little stress and emphasis, enabling it to expand into the space available with all its beauty. Too often, in my opinion, interpretations concentrate on making the material over-profound and overtly beautiful. The emphasis thereby required causes us to stop a marvel rather than go with the flow. And this flow is so mesmerically beautiful that, whenever I hear the symphony played, I feel as though I ought to stand up towards the end and acknowledge the breadth of the musical vision and its emotional power.
It was this, the emotional power that was enduring throughout the performance. I, for one, notwithstanding the criticism of other, will treasure the experience of Mahler 3 under Adam Fischer. It was, simply, one of the most emotional experiences I have had in sixty years of concert going.
I realise that I have not mentioned Catriona Morison,
who sand the contralto part in the fourth movement superbly. I state again that
this performance was not only memorable. It will live in my memory as long as I
have such a facility!
