Concerts seasons often parade a procession of “great works”
calculated to promote ticket sales. Anything less well known is often regarded
as risky because audiences, though they tend not to know what they like, always
like what they know. Performances of great works often become mundane
acknowledgments of the work’s existence, without getting to grips with its
substance. Audiences go home happy, ticket sales are satisfactory, and the
works of thousands of composers never see the light of day.
So would the program of the Four Last songs of Richard
Strauss followed by Shostakovich’s Seventh Symphony fall into this perfunctory
category? It might. But in Alicante’s ADDA concert hall last night, it definitely
did not. Indeed, this is never the case when it comes to the playing
and interpretation of ADDA Simfònica under Josep Vicent. Last night, the audience was
surely in the presence of living greatness, not just past achievement. During
last week, I met a friend whom I knew would also be going to hear the music and
expressed the opinion that Shostakovich’s Leningrad Symphony was a life-changer.
I understated the reality. And you might be wondering why a concert review
opens like this… I hope to make that clear later. First, the facts.
The hall was packed to hear Iréne Theorin sing the Four Last Songs of
Richard Strauss and the ADDA Simfònica under artistic director Josep Vicent
play the symphony. To say that this audience loves its resident orchestra would
also be an understatement. Every player is applauded onto the stage and off it,
every time. This adoration is individual recognition, communally expressed, of
both the work the orchestra does in presenting taxing programmes and also the
quality of the experience they regularly deliver. ADDA Simfònica is now a great
orchestra, and their artistic director is the leading light.
We began last night with Richard Strauss’s songs, with
Iréne
Theorin as soloist. The opening phrases might have suggested
that she might have a little too much vibrato for this work, but like many
initial fears this proved groundless. This is a work that needs control and
expression, rather than power or decoration, and Iréne Theorin not only delivered, she
excelled. There was a slight surprise when at the end of the fourth song, when the
valedictory trills on the flute were played rather softer than is often the
case. In the context of the work, this low-key wave of goodbye fitted
perfectly. It is not surprising, given the soloist’s experience in performing
the music of Richard Strauss that Iréne Theorin’s interpretation
proved nothing less than exceptional. We did have an
encore. It was one of Strauss’s orchestral songs, which ultimately gave Iréne
Theorin an opportunity to demonstrate
a little of her power.
And then what more can be written about this symphony? Let’s
take for granted that it was played wonderfully, was interpreted to perfection
and was received in absolute silence with every note absorbed by its audience.
For me personally, the opening movement has a clear
programme. The complexity and sophistication of ordinary life in Leningrad is portrayed
in the opening section in music that regularly changes key and rhythm. The
simple message of the opposing theme portrays the idea of fascism. Keep it
simple and keep saying the same thing. People will believe you. It starts
small, indeed it does. But with each new adherent, the ideology grows into
something that creates a powerful need to impose itself on everything.
Ideologically this is the fascism of the 1930s. Musically, it is the ideology
of pop, being populism, not popularity. That comes later. Just try getting away
from pop music… And, I might add, I don’t mean
Indian pop, or Tanzanian pop. I mean an international pop, nearly always in sung
in English, where the visuals trump the aurals. Here I return to the idea at
the start of the piece, because it is a marketing necessity that the product
should always be presented that way. Make sure there are no surprises, and then
you will not offend. And you will sell more worthless product.
At the end of the first movement, after the idea of
fascism has led to huge conflict, the sophisticated life of those who don’t want everything to be the same returns, but it is
exhausted. Though the movement ends lyrically, the fascist tendency is still
there, perhaps in the form of a dictator, perhaps acknowledging that this
desire to impose the conformity of a group is part of us all. At the end of the
symphony, when the triumphal but unconvincing fanfares ring out, proclaiming what
is clearly a rather hollow victory, the memory of conflict, complete with its
conformity-imposing mechanical rhythm is still there. But is it now at least
the rhythm of the opening of Beethoven’s Fifth?
The symphony’s central movements are full of
reflection, lyricism, nostalgia, desolation and nightmare. It is an
acknowledgment of the excellent design of the ADDA hall to record that even
pianissimo pizzicati can be heard anywhere. We assume, of course, as ever, that
there is near total silence from the audience. There always is.
My introduction of the work to the work came from
Leonard Bernstein’s CBS recording with the Chicago Symphony Orchestra.
Throughout, he uses significantly slower tempi than we heard last night. It’s a
different take on what is, after all, a personal experience. On this recording,
there is a moment during the first movement, when the sophistication of the
people returns after the war, after the exhaustion is expressed and the
desolation is recorded, when the sophistication represented by the strings
returns with renewed but exhausted energy. On the recording, just before this
entry, Bernstein issues a long side of relief which was picked up by the
microphones. Personally, I cannot listen to this music without hearing that unscored
sigh. I heard the reissue of the same recording a few weeks ago, and the
engineers have removed the sigh.
At the start of the symphony last night, Josep Vicent
decided to project images of the siege of Leningrad on the backdrop, closing
the sequence with a statement that there were currently fifty conflicts in the
world and that collectively we wanted to be ambassadors of peace. I said earlier
that the Leningrad Symphony is a life-changer, and it still is, no matter how
many times it is heard. Let’s put the
people back into music, no matter how much we crave standardized products.
Experience is unique. And this one was no exception. And it will live a
lifetime.