This was a concert
of two very unequal halves, at least in length, let alone style. The two parts
were equal when it came to their standard of performance, however. A program
that pits Gershwin against Shostakovich, especially in the latter’s most bleak
form, is always going to present a contrast, and a both delightful and
thoughtful contrast it proved to be.
Now I admit that I
am biased. I first heard Shostakovich’s Eighth Symphony in London under Kiril
Kondrashin in the early 1970s and the work has stayed firmly in my listening
habits ever since. It is not, however, a work to which I listen regularly,
maybe once a month at most, because it remains a harrowing experience, no
matter how familiar one becomes with its argument.
Shostakovich’s
three war symphonies deal with conflict in number seven, victory, albeit hollow,
in number nine and raw suffering in number eight. Such subject matter makes
number seven, paradoxically, the most accessible of the three with its self-delusion
of an apparently triumphal ending. Number nine is so hollowly cynical that it
becomes a talking point rather than a musical experience. Number eight, on the
other hand, is visceral in its content and thus disturbing in concert. But,
from time to time, it is good to be disturbed, to be reminded of the
consequence of certain kinds of human behaviour. The fact that it is human
behaviour is obvious, by the way, since other life forms do not make bombs.
The concert’s
first half offered contrast with the anticipated suffering that was to follow.
It was a performance of Gershwin’s Piano Concerto by Yol Eum Son. This is music
of sheen and gloss. As piano concertos go, this one is dressed up for a night
out and is packed with references to the popular culture of the time, the
roaring twenties, the jazz age. But there is enough in the solo part to link it
with works in the same genre by Bartók, Prokofiev, or even Rachmaninov in its
simultaneously percussive and lyrical style. There are times, unfortunately,
where the soloist becomes overwhelmed by Gershwin’s
rather heavy orchestration, but that is clearly how Gershwin wanted things.
Despite sometimes being eclipsed, Yol Eum Son played with such perfection that
her performance was at times breathtaking, both technically brilliant, and
musically considered. The experience was further refined by Josep Vicent’s
direction of the ADDA orchestra. The rehearsal time had clearly been well used,
with the orchestra entering the idiom of Gershwin’s work as well as playing the
notes. With an orchestra of the standard of Alicante’s
ADDA, however, this might be possible without rehearsal!
Overall, the
Gershwin Piano Concerto shows off everything that is good about the composer’s music - directness, melody, rhythm and good-time sheen
- alongside everything that is less than wonderful, being the broad brush of
the composer’s orchestration and the frequent dominance of effect over content.
But this program was perfection as far as this work was concerned. Yol Eum Son finished
with the piano arrangement of Gershwin’s Summertime by Earl Wild.
And so to the
Shostakovich, which was written barely twenty years after the Gershwin, two
decades that had seen Gershwin’s celebrating world view become depression, and
then war. If the first part of this concert approached perfection, then the
second part definitely achieved it.
Josep Vicent
clearly programmed this work to coincide with the eightieth anniversary of the
liberation of Auschwitz, a point he made while addressing the audience at the
end. But also this work clearly occupies a special place in his musical
thoughts. He chose a very slow tempo in the opening movement and thoroughly
respected the composer’s dynamics amongst the strings. It is often overlooked
that the first violins only enter when the marking is pianissimo. This allowed
him to stress the changes in dynamics and rhythm that followed to dramatic
effect. And in this symphony, Shostakovich uses his often-explored technique of
a long moderato with a central allegro climax, and then a denouement, usually featuring
a solo instrument. In this case, it is the cor anglais accompanied by a
sustained tremolo that often causes string players to tire. Here, this perfect
was – yes – perfect played, paced and interpreted.
Personally, I find
that the work’s core, however, is the fourth movement, the slow, highly
internalized examination of grief and loss. This is music that invites you into
its world. As an audience member, you have to become part of the performance
because this music forces you to confront the emotional cracks that Gershwin,
for instance, would simply paint over. It is also why this Symphony, to my ear,
works only when heard in concert since this participatory element, this
communication between performers and listeners is less intense in a recording.
At the end of the Eighth
Symphony, Shostakovich allows the music to settle into its own sleep.
Everything dies away, but we are left very much alive with the memories that it
provoked. The audience’s silence at the end of the work was indeed part of its
effect and surely part of its performance. Well done the ADDA audience! A
performance of this work will last in the memory forever, if the work is played
well and with commitment. Needless to say that this performance by Josep Vicent
and the ADDA Orchestra satisfied in every aspect.
Shostakovich’s Eighth
surely does not need an encore. But if it is to have one, Josep Vicent chose a
perfect ending in Ravel’s Pavane for a Dead Princess. This works still
concentrates on loss, but the Ravel offers a little sweetness to round off a
savoury meal. And Ravel’s subtle orchestral touches really do enhance the
musical experience, reminding us of the fact that Gershwin once asked for
classes from Ravel to improve his technique.